.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Looking on the Heart

I thought I would include another paper written for my classics class - a paper on Victor Hugo's "Les Miserables" (oh, how I love that book!).  Not only will this make it easier for me to find these essays (organization is not my strong point!), but the piece also discusses one of the things I am working to become: a person who looks on the heart. 



“In the country near D—, there was a man who lived alone.  This man, to state the startling fact without preface, had been a member of the National Convention.  His name was G—.  The little circle of D— spoke of the conventionist with a certain sort of horror.  A conventionist, think of it…This man came very near being a monster.” 


So writes Victor Hugo, setting the stage for one of the most powerful and poignant scenes in his novel, Les Miserables.  The reader has already become acquainted with the Bishop Bienvenu-Myriel: his goodness, his compassion, his humility, his love.  He is the best of men – a saint.  Thus, when he journeys to visit G—, a man whom he views “as an outlaw, even beyond the law of charity,” there is no reason to suspect that the conventionist could be anything otherwise.  The scene unfolds.  The bishop – and the reader – come to realize that they have been mistaken.  And with this realization, a lesson of eternal import is taught:  men – all men, even the best of men – are subject to look upon the “outward appearance” only and to wrongfully judge others.  That is why it is not given to men to judge others; it is given to them instead to learn to love.


When the bishop arrives at the residence of G— it is with reluctance and revulsion.  He introduces himself coolly; his tone is one of accusation and austerity.  G— responds with unruffled dignity.  He does not excuse or justify, but he speaks of hidden things – his motives, his hopes, his ideals.  The bishop feels as if “something in him ha[s] been struck.”  Once so confident in his condemnation, he finds himself becoming uncomfortably unsure about his assessment of the man.  He learns that, at the root, the tree of this man’s feelings and desires is the same as his own.  The fruit may look different, but the root is of the same stock.  This “monster,” this “conventionist,” seeks what he, himself, is seeking:  succor for the weak and downtrodden, compassion for the poor and lowly, justice for the defenseless and abused.  Though his actions appear frightening and terrible, they stem from a love and courage and sense of duty both ennobling and sanctifying.  As G— passes on to the “selfhood of the infinite,” the bishop asks for his blessing and pardon, and is left astonished, humbled, and changed…and one step nearer “his approach to perfection.”


The reader is also left astonished and changed.  If such a man as the bishop could have been so mistaken in his assessment of another, how often do those less-near perfection make the same mistake?  Men go about their lives almost mechanically passing judgment on those around them.  They are usually confident that their estimations are accurate.  But, if the truth were known, would they find these assumptions had been based on the outward appearance alone?  Would the heart of the matter, if it could be discerned, reflect something entirely different?  These questions are forced upon the reader at the passing of G— .   They resurface throughout the novel.  And each time they do, they demand thoughtful reflection. Hugo seems to be pleading with man – every man – to relinquish the role of judge to the only one who has a legitimate claim to that title, and instead strive to understand and extend mercy.  He seems to join with the poet in his plea: 


Therefore look gently on men, and even more gently on women.

Although they may go a little wrong, do not condemn them.

Above all consider not merely what they have done, but why.

God alone has the power to look into a human heart,

To judge actions and motives and regrets.

He alone knows not only what one has done and why,

But what one has resisted doing and why–

Man's responsibility is to forgive:

Only God has the authority to judge.              --Robert Burns--


The bishop leaves the presence of G— with a determination to redouble “his tenderness and brotherly love for the weak and the suffering.”  He also seems to silently entreat each reader to remember the lesson he has learned: that only God has the authority to judge.  Man’s responsibility is to forgive, to pity, to minister, to succor, to lift, to heal, to love...
to look on the heart.




No comments:

Post a Comment